Some Basic Questions on sorting and their solutions

1 .In a selectionsort of n elements, how many times is the swap function called in the complete execution of the algorithm?

A. 1
B. n - 1
C. n log n
D. n^2

Solution: B. n-1


2 .Selectionsort and quicksort both fall into the same category of sorting algorithms. What is this category?

* A. O(n log n) sorts
* B. Divide-and-conquer sorts
* C. Interchange sorts
* D. Average time is quadratic.

Solution: C.Interchange sorts reason:Selection sort is not O(n log n) and not a Divide-conquer sort too and Average time of quicksort is not quadratic.

3 . Suppose that a selectionsort of 100 items has completed 42 iterations of the main loop. How many items are now guaranteed to be in their final spot (never to be moved again)?

* A. 21
* B. 41
* C. 42
* D. 43


Solution: C. 42

4 .Suppose we are sorting an array of ten integers using a some quadratic sorting algorithm. After four iterations of the algorithm's main loop, the array elements are ordered as shown here:

1 2 3 4 5 0 6 7 8 9

Which statement is correct? (Note: Our selection sort picks largest items first.)

* A. The algorithm might be either selection sort or insertion sort.
* B. The algorithm might be selectionsort, but could not be insertionsort.
* C. The algorithm might be insertionsort, but could not be selectionsort.
* D. The algorithm is neither selectionsort nor insertionsort.

Solution: C. The algorithm might be insertion sort, but could not be selection sort.

5 .Suppose we are sorting an array of eight integers using a some quadratic sorting algorithm. After four iterations of the algorithm's main loop, the array elements are ordered as shown here:

2 4 5 7 8 1 3 6

Which statement is correct? (Note: Our selectionsort picks largest items first.)

* A. The algorithm might be either selectionsort or insertionsort.
* B. The algorithm might be selectionsort, but it is not insertionsort.
* C. The algorithm is not selectionsort, but it might be insertionsort.
* D. The algorithm is neither selectionsort nor insertionsort.

Solution: C. The algorithm is not selectionsort, but it might be insertionsort.

6 .When is insertionsort a good choice for sorting an array?

* A. Each component of the array requires a large amount of memory.
* B. Each component of the array requires a small amount of memory.
* C. The array has only a few items out of place.
* D. The processor speed is fast.

Solution: C. The array has only a few items out of place.

7 What is the worst-case time for mergesort to sort an array of n elements?

* A. O(log n)
* B. O(n)
* C. O(n log n)
* D. O(n^2)

Solution : C. O(n log n)

8 What is the worst-case time for quicksort to sort an array of n elements?

* A. O(log n)
* B. O(n)
* C. O(n log n)
* D. O(n^2)

Solution: D. O(n^2)

9 .Mergesort makes two recursive calls. Which statement is true after these recursive calls finish, but before the merge step?

* A. The array elements form a heap.
* B. Elements in each half of the array are sorted amongst themselves.
* C. Elements in the first half of the array are less than or equal to elements in the second half of the array.
* D. None of the above.

Solution: B. Elements in each half of the array are sorted amongst themselves.

10 .Suppose we are sorting an array of eight integers using quicksort, and we have just finished the first partitioning with the array looking like this:

2 5 1 7 9 12 11 10

Which statement is correct?

* A. The pivot could be either the 7 or the 9.
* B. The pivot could be the 7, but it is not the 9.
* C. The pivot is not the 7, but it could be the 9.
* D. Neither the 7 nor the 9 is the pivot.

Solution: A. The pivot could be either the 7 or the 9.

11 .What is the worst-case time for heapsort to sort an array of n elements?

* A. O(log n)
* B. O(n)
* C. O(n log n)
* D. O(n^2)
Solution: C. O(n log n)

12.Suppose you are given a sorted list of N elements followed by f(N) randomly ordered elements.How would you sort the entire list if
* A. f(N)=O(1)
* B. f(N)=O(logN)
* C. f(N)=O(N^1/2)
* D. How large can f(N) be for the entire list still to be sortable in O(N) time?
Solution:
A. f(N)=O(1) In this case insertion sort would be the best ,giving the time complexity of O(N)

B. f(N)=O(log N) Merge sort is the best option with a time complexity of O(N)

C.f(N)=O(N^1/2) Merge sort is the best option with a time complexity of O(N)

D.complexity = f(N)log f(N) + N +f(N)
Clearly f(N) is O(N) for the complexity to be of O(N)

Now O(N) is an over estimate on the upper bound of f(N) ,which is quite clear from the first term in the above expression.

Now let f(N) is of the form k.N^(1/p ).Then with some simplification we get

f(N)log(f(N)) is O(N ^(2/p)) and now to restrict the whole expression to O(N)
we need to restrict p to p >= 2

But f(N)is O(N^(1/p)) which means f(N) can at most be of size N^1/2 .

13.Prove that any algorithm that find an element X in a sorted list of N elements requires Omega(log N) comparisons.

Solution:The search essentially becomes a search for X in a binary decision tree and this requires Omega(log N) comparisons.

14.Prove that sorting N elements with integer keys in the range 1 < Key < M
takes O(M + N) time using bucket sort.

Solution: Putting the elements in to their corresponding buckets is of O(N).Then iteration of the buckets and printing the corresponding keys as many times as their frequency is of O(M+N).Hence the total complexity.

15.Suppose you have an array of N elements,containing only 2 distinct keys, true and false.Give an O(N) algorithm to sort the array.

Solution:Use bucket sort with 2 buckets.

16.Prove that any comparison based algorithm to sort 4 elements requires at least 3 comparisons and at the max comparisons
Solution:The binary decision tree has maximum distance of 3 and a maximum distance of 5 ,from the root to the leaf.As each edge corresponds to a comparison,we need minimum of 3 and maximum of 5 comparisons to sort 4 elements.

17. In how many ways can 2 sorted arrays of combined size N be merged?
Solution:Still up for debate.Any answers? :)

18.Show that binary insertion may reasonably be expected to be an O(n log n) sort.
Solution:Binary insertion sort employs binary search to find the right place to insert new elements, and therefore performs ceil (log(n!)) comparisons in the worst case, which is Θ(n log n). The algorithm as a whole still takes Θ(n2) time on average due to the series of swaps required for each insertion, and since it always uses binary search, the best case is no longer Ω(n) but Ω(n log n).


19.You are given two sets of numbers Xi and Yj , where i and j run from 1 to N.
Devise an algorithm to find the M largest values of Xi −Yj . This algorithm should
not be quadratic in N, though it is permitted to be quadratic in M.
You should regard N as being of the order of 20,000 and M as being of the order
of 1,000.
Solution:Use an order-statistic algorithm to find the Mth largest number in X,partition around that number and sort the M largest numbers.Repeat this for Y but sorting the M smallest numbers.This can be done in O(N+M log(M))Now with each of these sub-arrays having M elements,find the difference between each element of X and Y.We have M difference elements for each Xi in sorted order and in total M^2 differences.Use merge sort repeatedly to merge these portions .This is of complexity M^2.Hence the procedure.

20.If 1024 numbers are drawn randomly in the range 0–127 and sorted by binary
insertion, about how many compares would you expect?
Solution:We have 3 comparisons coming in to the picture a<b, a>b, a=b.The overall number of comparisons won't change and it is still of the O(N log N). strictly speaking log(N!) comparisons.





The answers for the rest of the questions shall be posted in a day.

Click Here For the set of Questions

5 comments:

  1. 1 b ,2 c,3 a,4 a,5 a,6 c,7c,8c,9a,10a,11a

    ReplyDelete
  2. @nagaraju

    for questions 4 and 5 ,considering the note in the brackets we will end up with an array sorted in decreasing order if we use selection sort,which
    doesn't agree with the ordering of the first 4 elements in either cases

    for question8, the average running time of quicksort is O(n log n) but not the worst case time which is O(n^2).Please verify it once again

    In Question9,choice 2 reflects the basic working of the mergesort,although we still doubt the validity of the first statement
    and this shall be done as soon as possible.

    In Q11,we are talking about sorting the array and not searching.SO please check it once again.

    ReplyDelete
  3. (a late response but ..it may help somebody ;) )
    @Rajiv:
    for question 4 and 5, the note in the bracket states "Selectionsort picks largest items first". This does not imply that we will get a decreasing order list because selection sort runs from n-1 to 1 (zero-specific code) and places the largest items in the n-1, n-2....2.1.0 position of the array.

    for question 8, the worst case for quicksort is O(n^2). In the worst case, the largest or smallest item is picked up as pivot and quicksort makes a pass over all elements in the array in linear time to sort a single item in array which results in O(n^2). :)

    for question 11: avg case, best case and worst case for heapsort is O(nlogn) always ...where does the "search" figure in the question?

    ReplyDelete
  4. anyone give me a full solution of problem 3
    why is 42

    ReplyDelete
  5. Selection Sort in C

    Selection sort is simplest way to sort array elements. Selection sort is based of maximum and minimum value. First check minimum value in array list and place it at first position (position 0) of array, next find second smallest element in array list and place this value at second position (position 1) and so on. Same process is repeated until sort all element of an array.

    ReplyDelete